"But we are clear: if the formalization is a disease that no one can be healthy, wants to win at all any knowledge for its own sake."
How much life we do not waste time on the dissolution of secondary misunderstandings. How many times have we wished that in ordinary times a throng of votes the Chair of the breaks in order to convey to our failed dialogues? One who sees one side as good as the others, which can make a fair ruling, which we will naturally follow, and without reluctance?
How much life we do not waste time on the dissolution of secondary misunderstandings. How many times have we wished that in ordinary times a throng of votes the Chair of the breaks in order to convey to our failed dialogues? One who sees one side as good as the others, which can make a fair ruling, which we will naturally follow, and without reluctance?
Maybe yes Moritz Schlick Our candidates:
"The physicists seem to be denied to speak with the poet of a green field and blue sky, or the historian of the enthusiasm of a hero of history or the rapture of a religious founder. It is true that he is not the words used, but it is not true that he in principle with the help of his term system would be unable to even express everything what is the communicable sense of the utterances of the historian and poet. For the purposes of those from poet or psychologist words used in all circumstances can only go back to the formal relations between the objects are given and explained. The word "green" is not rich (on the contrary, even poorer) than the term of the frequency of light vibrations, which the physicist uses in his place. " [From: Experience, knowledge, metaphysics]
It may perhaps not everyone can use with any but the physicist is all.
(The dates for the next communication seminars will be announced soon.)
0 comments:
Post a Comment